What Does Consent Mean When Saying "No" Has Consequences?

Early Wednesday, whilst the NBC morning news team shakily on-air that Matt Lauer had been terminated from his put up — the result of a damning sexual harassment allegation — it became doubtful how lengthy it would take for the skeletons to begin tumbling out of his closet. seems: eight hours.

by using mid-afternoon, range had its months-lengthy investigation into the large name anchor’s alleged records of on-the-task predatory conduct. The listing of accusations is long and gross, and includes details like how he as soon as purchased a intercourse toy for a colleague and gave it to her along side a word describing what he wanted to do with it. Atop other anecdotes and annoying revelations, the variety reportage aired the truth that Lauer changed into granted a button underneath the desk in his office, which made it possible for him to lock the door with out ever having to upward thrust from his seat. Fancy that.

but at the same time as the NBC group — inclusive of Savannah Guthrie and Hoda Kotb, who had been put in the role of breaking annoying information approximately a colleague on these days with little word — did their first-rate to temper their apparent surprise with journalistic integrity and empathy for the “brave colleague” who came forward together with her story, it didn’t take lengthy for different individuals of the media to begin talking out on Lauer’s behalf. (Lauer himself has now not but publicly commented on his split with NBC, or the accusations, as of time of publishing.). One such media guy became Geraldo Rivera, who reputedly grew to become to a Fifties-generation playbook for a way to make mild of misogyny; in fact, his motive became so unfashionable-ridiculous that it nearly seems as even though it become crafted expressly for refutation. allow’s live in reality right here, though: probable not.

quickly after range’s story broke, the previous talk show host and FOX information commentator took to Twitter with the subsequent declaration: “unhappy about @MLauer excellent guy, enormously professional & empathetic w guests & a actual gentleman to my own family & me. news is a flirty business & it looks as if the cutting-edge epidemic of #SexualHarassmentAllegations can be criminalizing courtship & conflating it w predation. What about #GarrisonKeiller?”

I know what you’re thinking: “Wow! Geraldo is truely abusing the prolonged individual restriction!” but more to the point … What a load of bullshit. Even FOX information disowned the feedback: In a announcement shared with Refiner29, the hole stated that "Geraldo's tweets do not mirror the perspectives of FOX information or its control. We were with the aid of his comments and are addressing them with him." no question there is a lots there it really is troubling.

Fox example: Rivera kicked things off with the aid of jumping into a sexist sand entice, presuming that just due to the fact a person has shown you the exceptional side of themselves manner which you recognize who they may be all of the time. Like Louis C.k., Harvey Weinstein, and Charlie Rose, Lauer is now known to have purposefully uncovered his penis to woman colleagues: Remembering his “extraordinary man” moments in no way mitigates that truth. And but, that defense keeps coming up, as even though if it’s stated often enough history can be rewound and the dick will retreat returned within the pants. furthermore, supplying up your singular revel in as a refutation to the handfuls of ladies who shared their harassment testimonies does nothing besides make you appear like a person who chooses now not to accept as true with girls, who have more to lose than benefit through coming ahead. It also ignores the fundamental fact that once many women speak out, the sheer quantity of those reviews need to make you question your very own: Are you the rule, or the exception?

2nd: in case you’re someone who thinks that news is an inherently “flirty enterprise” — (now not) sorry to be the only to break it to you, however you’re doing information incorrect. even though permit’s count on, for a moment, that via “flirty” Rivera meant that news is a business where you wind up spending a lot of time in near quarters with colleagues, on occasion overdue into the night time, frequently on topics that convey up emotional responses or surges of adrenaline, and that, taken altogether, those instances can translate into an environment that is less buttoned up than, say, working in a technology lab.

Even then, there may be no excuse to summon a female colleague in your (button door locking) office for intercourse and then, whilst she refuses, punish her professionally, as Lauer allegedly did. Nor does it provide you with carte blanche to annoy colleagues over textual content or e-mail, or compare their bed room “overall performance” to their job performance, as Lauer was pronounced to have carried out. What all this constitutes isn't always flirtation: It’s abuse, of the women themselves, in addition to the type of work environment that always requires mutable limitations and a experience of community and places faith in its employees to admire each other.

Which bring us to the heart of the trouble in this case, and many others love it. Explicitly or no longer, Matt Lauer used his energy to intimidate women into filing to his advances or keeping quiet. He changed into reportedly “paranoid” about being observed with the aid of tabloid reporters, an tension that would also were a ruse to justify his want for discretion and privateness.

but because of his public profile, and the advantages, and the connections, it afforded him; due to his price to the community as a personality that drew in dependable visitors; due to his cash, and reputation; and because acquiescing to his advances should have the capability to make or smash a profession: the size changed into usually tipped in his direction. The dynamics had been abused. And, yes, as variety mentioned, a number of the relationships Lauer (who, with the aid of the way, has been married for almost a long time, and has 3 school-age kids) participated in had been consensual. however what does it mean to “consent” while you may suffer a penalty for pronouncing no?

girls appear to have a quite suitable experience of after they’re being wooed and once they’re being preyed upon, regardless of how puzzling a few men claim to find that territory. to say that, in our present day era, “courtship” is being mislabeled as “predation” is not simplest a misreading of what’s taking place at NBC and in all the other hotel rooms and offices with locked doorways wherein ladies were “pursued”: It’s a transparently sexist invalidation. As for that Garrison Keillor hashtag afterthought? i suspect that Rivera became speculating about a quote the radio host manner back in 1994: “A international in which there may be no sexual harassment at all is a international wherein there'll now not be any flirtation.”

In fact, it is a unsuitable equation Keillor is setting up: the concept that sexual harassment and flirtation can every so often be viewed as the equal component — that it’s all just a rely of angle. He were given it wrong. even if flirting actually is just flirting, that doesn’t mean it belongs in the administrative center. moreover, it's miles feasible to be near a colleague without ever stepping over the road. girls continually appear with a view to decipher in which it falls. What’s nefarious is that guys generally can, too. however sometimes, they pick out to pretend otherwise and count on us to believe them.

This publish turned into updated after it changed into publish to encompass an respectable assertion from FOX information Channel.

Source: Here

What Does Consent Mean When Saying "No" Has Consequences? Photo Gallery